<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga-abuse] Re: [Admin] Warning
Roberto, you are also entitled to your opinions and I will appreciate when
you get the facts straight. In order to do this you will have to rely on
more than your memory; but the facts that are obvious and available, most
of them publicly.
By the way, you all are welcome to make any changes you require to make the
lists seem like so many of these things did not happen; however, I and many
others have a complete record of the GA's list and I have a complete record
of the GA-Abuse list. I also am aware of those who have complete records
of the InterNIC lists. A re-posting of these would be fabulous for Kent, I
wonder if we could find a even semi-polite post from him there?
Additionally, the new rules of conduct you, Alexander, and Thomas seem to
support (according to your recent comments, past comments and behaviors).
1) Your opinion ensures the belief and understanding that some folks are
simply more equal than others in the DNSO.
2) Your opinion ensures the belief and understanding that anyone from
within the chosen special group may send a falsified post to the GA's
monitored list and receive praise for being funny.
3) Your opinion ensures the belief and understanding that anyone may be
cruel to a select group of participants and receive praise rather than be
expected to adhere to common decency or the rules.
4) People who are honest and have integrity are to be abused as often and
as harshly as possible should they choose to participate.
Many of us would appreciate it if you would please post a list of those
members of the GA who are not expected to comply with the rules and those
whom we may not pick on because of their illegal actions.
I understand the list starts like this:
1) Kent Crispin
2) Dave Crocker
3) ...
Thomas, you owe me an apology for what you wrote to the group. There is no
excusing it. I don't care how compelled you feel to abuse Jeff Williams,
there is no excuse for illegal activity on this list.
~k
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|