ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-abuse] M1 Against William Walsh



Hello Kristy and fellow ga-abuse readers,

I think it would be a bit strange to resume
list monitoring all of a sudden, and to
enforce it against someone who, as he mentioned
in previous messages, thinks that the list
monitors have stopped working.

On the other hand, the message is a clear
violation of the rules, as you (Kristy) already
stated.

If we are to resume the work, I would propose
to make this clear to the list first and therefore
send William X Walsh a clear warning. Furthermore,
I would propose that each of us sends *warnings*
about list rules violations immediately, without
waiting for complaints: friendly, but clear
personal e-mails cc ga-abuse. If the list rules
violations continue after the warnings, we
recommence our M1/M2 procedures. How does that
sound?

Again: Before we resume, I think a message to
the GA list would be appropriate.

Best regards,
/// Alexander


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>