ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] RE: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings


ACK

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: k@widgital.com [mailto:k@widgital.com]
|> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:43 AM
|> To: Roeland Meyer
|> Cc: ga-abuse@dnso.org
|> Subject: RE: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 
|> 'Hijacking' Rulings
|> 
|> 
|> Mr. Meyer,
|> 
|> The five post per day per list limit is still in place.
|> 
|> :)
|> 
|> At 01:04 PM 10/28/2001 -0800, you wrote:
|> >|> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
|> >|> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 2:08 PM
|> >
|> >|> Roeland Meyer wrote:
|> >|> > |> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
|> >|> > |> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 12:45 PM
|> >|> > |> William X Walsh wrote:
|> >|> > |> > Sunday, Sunday, October 28, 2001, 12:33:22 AM, Joop
|> >|> > |> Teernstra wrote:
|> >|> > |> > > At 17:38 26/10/01 -0700, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
|> >
|> >|> > |> > >>There's also a pretty significant enforcement issue. How
|> >|> > |> would you propose
|> >|> > |> > >>to enforce judgements?
|> >
|> >|> > |> > > Forfeiture of a Bond in favour of the 
|> successful defendant?
|> >|> > |> > > We can at least *try*.
|> >|> > |> >
|> >|> > |> > Ok, so the first step would be for someone to draw up
|> >|> a document
|> >|> > |> > detailing changes that would need to be made to the
|> >|> current UDRP to
|> >|> > |> > make this happen.  Let's not lose this idea to non-action,
|> >
|> >|> > |> > Any volunteers to do that step?
|> >
|> >|> > |> What I would like to know however is their a 
|> minimum amount that
|> >|> > |> the bond should be set for?
|> >|> >
|> >|> > $50K US should cover most expenses.
|> >|>
|> >|>   Perhaps this is a little high, but not unreasonable.
|> >
|> >It is reasonable considering the alternative legal costs, 
|> but dropping it to
|> >$25K US is also reasonable, considering that there is no 
|> set criteria. In
|> >the case of an abusive complaint, which is usually brought 
|> about by a large
|> >corp, $25K US is almost a Manager level budget approval, 
|> whereas $50K US
|> >would need Director approval. This helps to forestall 
|> abusive complaints
|> >before they are made. Yet, legitimate complaints can be 
|> funded for $5K US,
|> >through a bonding company.
|> >--
|> >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
|> >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
|> >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
|> >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
|> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>