[ga-abuse] substantiation

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 22:17 16/12/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>Will I have to tolerate this, or will you enforce your rules?
>
>If you don't enforce them swiftly, I will defend myself against
>allegations like this, vociferously.
>
>
>Saturday, December 16, 2000, 9:00:18 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>
>> At 12:09 16/12/00 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
>
>>>Nobody is lying, nobody has been called a liar, and there are no actual
>>>facts that are in dispute.  The issue is the SIGNIFICANCE of the 
>>>non-disputed facts.
>>>
>
>> I recall that Mr Walsh took the opportunity to take an offensive swipe at
>> the veracity of the quoted tresolution. 
>> Now Vany has spoken out, an apology would be part of normal civil
discourse.
>

As the webmaster of the IDNO website I was deeply offended by this posting:

> I was present when these resolutions were made, both in Santiago and again
> in Yokohama
> for the text see
> http://www.democracy.org.nz/idno/resolution1.htm

> Perhaps an NCDNHC member representative can point to the "authorised
version".

I hope so.  History shows that the IDNO website tends to be subject to
a lot of creative license on issues like this.

-- 
Best regards,
William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com

and I asked for list rule enforcement.
I write this to back up my "allegation".
If you want to act as list-judges, now you have something to judge.