ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] Re: [ga] Appeal of William Walsh


At 15:29 20/11/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:

>
>The only way around that is to just declare the entire subject of the
>IDNO as verboten and enforce any violation of that equally.
>

That is the height of arrogance and would set a precedent for any other
list bully to so gag a bona-fide listmember.
Walsh would have accomplished his mission of silencing me.

Not *what* is discussed should be censored, but the only the personal
attacks and the unsubstatiated accusations and innuendo. 

Instead of an apology, we now get conditions.

>In other words, Roberto, I will not cease my refutation of claims made
>here regarding the IDNO as long as those claims continue to be made.
>

This is a challenge of the list moderation system and the newly approved
rules.

--Joop--
www.idno.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>