ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-abuse]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga-abuse] Fwd: [ga] Individual Constituency



I thought he was removed for being a JW clone?

If not, I challenge the uniqueness of Jeff Williams and Bob Davis.


This is a forwarded message


From: Bob Davis <bob.davis@netzero.net>
To: dnso General assembly list <ga@dnso.org>
Date: Monday, September 11, 2000, 2:43:42 PM
Subject: [ga] Individual Constituency

===8<==============Original message text===============
Everyone,

  I have been following along on the question of whether an
individual constituency such as the (IDNO?) should or could be
allowed to be a DNSO constituency.  Some of what I have been
reading is disturbing.  Is there some possibly reason that the IDNO
cannot be a DNSO constituency that would be related to any member
of that organization???!!!  It would seem from the tenor of some
DNSO participants that this would be likely....  Am I mistaken?
If so, please feel free to correct me.  And when doing so, please
explain why I am reading such as a possible motivation....

Thank you.
Bob Davis...




_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>