[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] DNSO Glitches and process: A report from the DNSO front.
- To: "Cthulhu's Little Helper" <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [discuss] DNSO Glitches and process: A report from the DNSO front.
- From: Richard Lindsay <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:17:40 +0900
- CC: email@example.com, "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Joop Teernstra <email@example.com>, "William X. Walsh" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, d3nnis <email@example.com>, Jonathan Zittrain <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Antony Van Couvering <email@example.com>, Donald Telage <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>, Dan Steinberg <email@example.com>, Amthony Rutkowski <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ed Gerck <email@example.com>, A Gehring <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Roberto Gaetano <Roberto.Gaetano@etsi.fr>, "Farber@Cis. Upenn. Edu" <email@example.com>, Karl Auerbach <karl@CAVEBEAR.COM>, Eva Frolich <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "J. William \"Bill\" Semich" <email@example.com>, Gordon Cook <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, "Esther Dyson (Esther Dyson)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Becky Burr <email@example.com>
- Organization: interQ Incorporated
- References: <199906300321.UAA04431@agamemnon.home.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
If I have ever met you, it escapes my memory. Therefore, I
guess this is your way of saying "hello, nice to meet you..."
Cthulhu's Little Helper wrote:
> Translation: "I agree with Roeland here."
As this is an introduction, I would like to request that you
not attempt to "translate" any of my comments. If you want
me to post in Japanese, than feel free to translate... If I
am vague, by all means ask for clarification.
> Thanks Richard. I was doing my best to keep an open mind about all of
> this. You've just convinced me that there really is a hidden agenda here.
> You'd think that after all that's passed, one of you would realize that
> patting us on the head and shooing us on our way won't make us shut up!
Your welcome Mark, anything I can do to help :-) Drat, you
saw through my hidden agenda hiding tactic :-(
> I am perfectly willing to work within any self-consistent set of rules
> your august body selects and actually makes an effort to obey. I think
> you'll find that once that happens, there may actually be some progress
> made. But as long as we need a playbook, a scorecard, and a self-updating
> hyperlinked reference to rules Bill Cosby would find a bit too wiggly to
> sell, progress may be difficult. You see, people don't want to play when
> you keep changing the rules so you can win.
> Now I remember why I dislike politics so much. Dishonesty sickens me.
The only possible constructive comment I can add, is that if you
are looking for consensus (which is what I interpreted part of
Roeland's post to be about) jumping on someone who you think is
disagreeing with a point, attempting to change their words to suit
your point of view, and in a round about way, calling them dishonest
will not result in any form of consensus.
By the way, I really don't understand the reference to Bill Cosby...
Have a nice day anyway...
_/_/_/Director and General Manager
_/_/_/Richard A. S. Lindsay