[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [discuss] Next Names Council Meeting
On Sat, 12 Jun 1999 19:52:51 -0700, Dave Crocker
>At 08:23 PM 6/12/99 -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
>>>The agreement was that all meetings will be kept open if possible. Our only
>>>concern is disruption. If there is disruption that does not permit the
>>As you're committing to being open, perhaps you
>>might also wish to open up your mailing list(s)
>>and allow people to attend the "agenda setting"
>>meetings as well.
>And, of course, you should make the voting open, with anyone voting who
>In addition, it is inappropriate for any of the members ever to have a
>For that matter, many places in the world have customs which do not afford
>one privacy at the toilet, so...
>Isn't it wonderful just how many different ways there are to criticize an
>effort, rather than offer constructive input and seek practical, forward
Funny, Dave. I've always thought this applied rather nicely to your
aptitude of joining forums whose goals you oppose for the sole purpose
of disrupting them, trying to make them lose their focus, and
otherwise impede their progress.
You are well known for this, Dave.
What I find so odd, is that you would describe it so well yourself.
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Fax:(209) 671-7934
"Let the people think they govern and they will be governed."
- William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania