RE: [council] Proposed amended resolution on name servers updates
Elisabeth, thanks for posting this.
I would prefer to offer some modifications so that there is primarily
a recommendation to support the focus on timely changes in the IANA
database, which I suspect all agree with, and to suggest that perhaps we cut out
some of the detail, which makes it harder to get full consensus on the NC.
My comments are, though, intended to address the "politics" of the situation of getting
a consensus resolution.
This is an especially lengthy resolution with a good deal of detail. And, it contains a
lot of information, which doesn't necessarily belong in a resolution, but might simply
belong in the background statement/briefing which you provide to the NC to support the resolution.
So, an area which I hope you can consider: I've found that it is always hard to get
a resolution with lots of details agreed to.. and that higher level
statements are best for resolutions. I wonder if we can achieve your goals
but with a slightly refined resolution?
And, then, there are some possible edits which achieve your goal, but might call for a minor edit
in word changes... for instance, I note that the use of the term "emergency" might be replaced with
URGENT, or PRIORITY ACTIONS. I don't think we can truly note that we have an "emergency". BUT, we do
want priority actions.... I wonder if that could work for you?
Overall, I believe that the goal should be to achieve a
resolution which can gain consensus support. Again, that may require a more "high level"
resolution than presently crafted. BUT, the value to the ccTLDs would be that it is possible to achieve a consensus
vote of support to a resolution.
Best regards, Marilyn
From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 7:48 PM
Subject: [council] Proposed amended resolution on name servers updates
The ccTLD Representatives on the Names Council had been sharing
with the ccTLD Managers the letter Stuart Lynn and Vint Cerf
have written to the Names Council on 21 September 2002.
The ICANN President and Chairman of the Board are seeking
the opinion of the Names Council on the suggestion to study how
to improve the DNS data quality at all levels in the system
with the help of the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee.
The ccTLD Managers welcome the suggestion from ICANN President
and Chairman of the Board to get an advice from the ICANN Security
Committee and note that the work on the DNS data quality is
a new activity, which comes in addition to the basic IANA function.
Taking it into account the ccTLD propose the following
amended resolution (to replace the one posted on 13 September):
Whereas the ICANN Evolution and Reform Committee (ERC) has published
its second implementation report,
Whereas the stability of the universal Internet has been part of
permanent preoccupations since the White Paper document,
Whereas on 28 November 1998, both the USG and the ICANN committed
to abide by the principle of Internet stability in the MoU,
Whereas the ccTLD Managers have been seeking an efficient process
for updating the IANA database, as previously provided before ICANN
took on the stewardship of the IANA function, as explicitly specified
in the Amendment 2 to the MoU of 11 September 2000, requesting
for "Documentation of IANA procedures for root zone editing,
root zone generation, and root zone WHOIS service."
Whereas the ccTLD IANA Service Requirements has been restated
once more in Bucharest on 25 June 2002 and approved unanimously
by the active ccTLD Managers within the ICANN community
Whereas the ICANN principle mission is to "Preserve and enhance the
operational stability, reliability, security, and global
interoperability of the Internet"
Whereas the global interoperability and stability of Internet
depends on the TLD name servers,
Whereas the recent bankruptcy of KPNQwest which provided secondary
services to several ccTLD Registries resulted in the need for
prompt actions by IANA to update the name servers records
as requested by the ccTLD Managers,
Whereas there is widespread dissatisfaction of ccTLD Managers about
the deterioration in the performance of the IANA function by ICANN
resulting in excessive delays (in some cases over 3 months)
in making updates to cctld name server information
Whereas Stuart Lynn and Vint Cerf have written to the Names Council
on 21 September seeking the opinion of the Names Council on the
suggestion to improve the DNS data quality at all levels in the system,
The NC therefore resolves that:
Since June 2002 there is an emergency related to the availability
of the ccTLD domain name servers and the preservation of the
integrity of the information provided by the servers,
and IANA should immediately process the changes in name servers
requested by the ccTLDs.
b. Day to day updates
ICANN is requested to authenticate name server requests received
from the appropriate ccTLD manager as soon as possible after
their receipt, to verify the name servers are authoritative for
the appropriate ccTLD, and to update the IANA database accordingly,
and making the appropriate recommendation to the USG in a
Should ICANN determine that any request from a ccTLD manager includes
a non-authoritative name server, ICANN is hereby encouraged to refer
the disputed request to the independent technical panel formed by
the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee and ccTLD Manager's
representatives for their opinion in a timely manner.
c. Improve the overal quality
In order to improve the quality of DNS and DNS data accuracy on all
levels ICANN is hereby encouraged to establish a collaborative work
between the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee,
the ccTLD Managers and the Regional Internet Registries,
which would produce a set of publicly available rules and procedures
and tools, for use at every level of DNS, to ensure everybody has
the same shared picture of what to do.