RE: [council] REQUEST FROM gTLD REGISTRY CONSTITUENCY
I support both the request from the gTLD Registry Constituency and the
request to include the two GA reps.
I also see no need for voting. The main objective is to share views at this
The views will most likely be personal at this stage, as there hasn't been
time to reach any consensus positions within the constituencies. Thus more
than one rep from each constituency on the call is useful.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cochetti, Roger [mailto:RCochetti@verisign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:02 AM
> To: Names Council (E-mail)
> Subject: [council] REQUEST FROM gTLD REGISTRY CONSTITUENCY
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neuman, Jeff
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:20 PM
> > To: 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com'
> > Subject: NC Restructuring Calls
> > Philip,
> > It appears that one or possibly two of our representatives
> may not be able
> > to be present on this week's NC call on Restructuring.
> Because we do
> > intend as a constituency to fully participate, we were
> wondering if it
> > would be possible for us to have one or two people listen
> and participate
> > on the call given the seriousness of the issue and the need to act
> > quickly. As we cannot envision any formal votes on this
> topic during
> > these calls, I would hope that there would be no obstacle
> to having our
> > request granted.
> > I can provide the names to you tomorrow if you would like.
> We would only
> > ask that a maximum of three gTLD reps be allowed to
> participate on the
> > call.
> > Thanks in advance.
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> > Director, Policy and Intellectual Property
> > NeuLevel, Inc.
> > Loudoun Tech Center
> > 46000 Center Oak Plaza
> > Building X
> > Sterling, VA 20166
> > p: (202) 533-2733
> > f: (202) 533-2970
> > e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.biz
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is
> intended only for the
> > personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
> > message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work
> product and as
> > such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this
> message is not
> > the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
> delivering it to the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
> received this
> > e-mail message and any attachments hereto in error and that
> any review,
> > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
> > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
> > notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.