ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] FW: [nc-idn] DRAFT MOTION proposal, version 2.


>>> "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com> 10/23/01 06:49PM >>>

Then the IETF should send a resolution to ICANN on its behalf if it has not
already done so.

MM====> 
This I agree with. Let IETF speak for itself - bearing in mind that
IETF is composed of engineers, that standardization issues involve
public policy and economic tradeoffs, and that IETF expertise 
does NOT extend to making such tradeoffs.

ICANN should not try to solve IETF's problems, nor should the 
leverage of the DNS root be exploited to FORCE companies 
to conform to IETF standards, or to conform to IETF's timetable.

--MM




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>