Re: [council] UDRP Review Task Force Selected

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

> From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
> To: "'council@dnso.org'" <council@dnso.org>,
>         "'tor-udrp@dnso.org'"
> 	 <tor-udrp@dnso.org>
> Subject: [council] UDRP Review Task Force Selected
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:21:15 -0500
> 
> The Task Force was selected by Milton and I yesterday.
> 
> There were only three areas where we had more than one nominee -
> Complainant, ADR expert, and academic expert.  Given that the majority of
> the nominees in other categories were from North America, and given that we
> had excellent nominees in these categories from outside North America, we
> eliminated any North American nominees in these categories and selected from
> there.  Fortunately, the ccTLDs provided three geographical diverse nominees
> so we chose the one form Africa since we did not otherwise have such a
> nominee.  
> 
> Once I accumulate their emails, I will forward them to the Secretariat and
> ask that she create an email group for us so that I can notify the selected
> individuals and we can begin discussions.
> 
> 
>  <<UDRP Nominees.DOC>> 
> 

Caroline,
Milton,

I had some personal difficulties to be on line, it is a little
in late, I am sorry.

Once I decoded the format I do not read, and completed with e-mails, 
I get 20 persons plus
Chairs: cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com
        mueller@syr.edu

I have two observations:
1. shall I add you as Chair and Milton as well ? Why then 2 candidates
   from 2 constituencies when ccTLD were refused more than one seat
   (bringing people from 3 continents)?
2. the simple arithmetics is:
   16 - NA, 14 NA plus two Chairs
    3 - EU
    1 - LAC
    1 - AF
    1 - AP
3. how many representatives are from countries with Roman law 
   (as opposed to case law ?), or from countries not using case law ?

I am not a lawyer, but as mathematician I wish express here my
strongest objections as to representation of this TF. 
The terms of reference appears without problem, but the outcome does.

Elisabeth Porteneuve
ccTLD NC rep
--


Business Constituency, Sarah Deutsch (NA) <sarah.b.deutsch@verizon.com>
ccTLD Constituency, Neil Duncan Dundas (AF) <ndundas@africaip.com>
gTLD Constituency, Jeff Neuman (NA) <Jeff.Neuman@NeuLevel.com>
IP Constituency, J. Scott Evans (NA) <jse@adamspat.com>
ISP Constituency, Antonio Harris (LAC) <harris@cabase.org.ar>
NCDNH Constituency, Michael Froomkin (NA) <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Registrar Constituency  Michael Palage (NA) <michael@palage.com>
Complainant (or representative), Katrina Burchell (EU) <Katrina.Burchell@unilever.com>
CPR Panelist, M. Scott Donahey (NA) <msd@tzmm.com>
CPR Provider, F. Peter Phillips (NA) <pphillips@cpradr.org>
eResolution Panelist, Ethan Katsh (NA) <katsh@legal.umass.edu>
eResolution Provider, Dr. Joelle Thibault (NA) <jthibault@eresolution.com>
NAF Panelist, James A. Carmody (NA) <carmody@lawyer.com>
NAF Provider, Tim Cole (NA) <tcole@arb-forum.com>
Respondent (or representative), John Berryhill (NA) <jberryhill@ddhs.com>
WIPO Panelist, Maxim Waldbaum (NA) <mwaldbaum@salans.com>
WIPO Provider, Erik Wilbers (EU) <erik.wilbers@wipo.int>
GA Member, Dan Steinberg (NA) <synthesis@videotron.ca>
Independent ADR expert, Joon Hyung Hong (AP) <joonh@chollian.net>
Independent academic expert, Graeme Dinwoodie (EU) <gdinwood@kentlaw.edu>

--