Re: [council] gTLD CONSTITUENCY RESOLUTION
fyi, we discussed on the ccomposition of the gTLD Review TF but not too
much in detail in Stockholm. We felt that the technical, business and
legal assessments of the New TLD Evaluation Process Planning Task Force
should be best performed by the appropriate ICANN SOs.
We discussed few scenarios but as the ICANN board has already taken the
decision to form the concerned task force as stated in resolution 01.60,
these may not be pertinent anymore. Therefore, we wish to offer our fully
support to the future TF, instead.
"erica" <firstname.lastname@example.org>@dnso.org on 13.06.2001 23:32:59
Sent by: email@example.com
To: "Cochetti, Roger" <Rcochetti@Verisign.Com>, <Yjpark@Myepark.Com>
Subject: Re: [council] gTLD CONSTITUENCY RESOLUTION
Thanks for this Roger. This is clearly a v important issue.
Can I get some clarification the composition and ToR of the gTLD Review TF
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cochetti, Roger" <RCochetti@verisign.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:04 AM
Subject: [council] gTLD CONSTITUENCY RESOLUTION
> YJ and Council-
> Here is the resolution put forward by the gTLD Constituency at the last
> meeting of the Names Council.
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice President & Chief Policy Officer
> (703) 326-2585/202-973-6600
> -----Original Message-----
> From: YJ Park [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:45 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [council] gTLD resolution on the New TLD Evauation Process
> Planning TF
> Council Members,
> Volunteering to be a member of New TLD evaluation TF,
> I would like to discuss several points before NC meeting
> before June 29.
> Some NC members have already pointed out some issues in
> the draft resolution distributed in the Stockholm NC meeting.
> Roger, can you distribute the draft resolution in the mailing list?
> I cannot find such document yet. Did I miss it?
> What I do remember was the composure of Evaluation Task
> Force which sounded very closed unnecessarily.