Re: [council] Fw: Input for the NC agenda

["Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>]

No YJ, I am not proposing any motion.  Rather, I am suggesting that you
(and/or Carolinee) formally propose a motion for consideration by the NC
setting out clear Terms of Reference (and timeframe) for your group.  Once
the motion is agreed, you will be able to progress with the full authority
of the NC.

erica.


----- Original Message -----
From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; <council@dnso.org>
Cc: <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>; <nc-intake@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [council] Fw: Input for the NC agenda


> Hello Erica,
>
> > Are you proposing a motion for the next meeting of the NC -
> > on proposed ToR and timeframes?
>
> Thank you for giving me a chance to clarify once again.:-)
>
> There will be two stages before and after WG formation.
> I already proposed regarding pre-stage in my earlier message.
>
> > [Action is needed]
> > Earlier motion: If we can reach an agreement as soon as possible,
> > as it is put here, this WG can start from Nov. 27.
>
> Since I have not heard any objection to proposed ToR and
> Timeframe from NC members, can I interpret this as a positive
> signal for this WG to start possibly 24 hours from now on?
>
> Elisabeth, first thank you for creating WG-F list,
> New archives created: Tue Nov 28 13:15:37 MET 2000.
>
> I think Joop's proposal can be related with after WG formation
> process. The recognition on the charter of WG by NC. I think
> his interest in constituency for individual DN holders should be
> discussed among the WG members, first.
>
> Therefore, if we let this group go asap, hopely this issue can be
> discussed at Dec. 19th's NC teleconference regarding the
> charter of this WG as one of post-WG formation processes.
>
> YJ
>
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> > To: <council@dnso.org>
> > Cc: <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>; <nc-intake@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 3:55 AM
> > Subject: [council] Fw: Input for the NC agenda
> >
> >
> > > This is input I have got from outside NC.
> > >
> > > YJ
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
> > > To: "YJ Park" <yjpark@aptld.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 2:08 PM
> > > Subject: Input for the NC agenda
> > >
> > >
> > > > Dear YJ,
> > > >
> > > > Could you make sure that the NC will not stall any further on
creating
> > > that
> > > > Working Group on DNSO reform and/or the specific admission of a
> > > > constituency for individual DN holders?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> > > > the Cyberspace Association and
> > > > the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> > > > Elected representative.
> > > > http://www.idno.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>