RE: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting

[Theresa Swinehart <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>]

Ken, 

the proposed schedule sounds fine. 

Thank you. 

Theresa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Ken Stubbs
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 8:49 AM
> To: Paul M. Kane; YJ Park; roberto gaetano
> Cc: mclaughlin@pobox.com; Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Louis
> Touton; names council; Mike Roberts; John Crain
> Subject: [council] proposed schedule for november icann meeting
> 
> 
> i have been informed that due to a special meeting which has 
> been called
> between icann -iana and the country code administrators, we 
> have been asked
> to revise our meeting schedule for the november names council 
> meeting. i
> talked to louis yesterday and we discussed this tentative schedule
> 
> november 14th -tuesday 9am -noon -  general assembly
> 1pm thru 4 pm -names council
> 
> i am also proposing another names council dinner on the previous night
> (monday november 13th) at approx 7:30 at the chart house restaurant in
> marina del rey (6 minutes from hotel) and have made tentative 
> reservations
> for same
> 
> i would appreciate your comments as soon as possible, both on 
> the proposed
> schedule as well as your interest in attending the proposed dinner
> 
> thanks
> 
> ken
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
> To: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> Cc: <mclaughlin@pobox.com>; "Ken Stubbs" 
> <kstubbs@corenic.org>; "Elisabeth
> PORTENEUVE" <Elisabeth.PORTENEUVE@cetp.ipsl.fr>; "Dany Vandromme"
> <vandrome@renater.fr>; "Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>; 
> "names council"
> <council@dnso.org>; "roberto gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>; 
> "Mike Roberts"
> <mmr@darwin.ptvy.ca.us>; "John Crain" <crain@icann.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 7:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [council] names council teleconference thurdsay 
> 21 september
> 
> 
> > Morning YJ / all
> >
> > Thank you for the opportunity to clarify any confusion ......
> >
> > We need a costing and I have asked John Crain for the price for the
> > Webcasting. NSI have kindly agreed to sponsor the web cast 
> SUBJECT to
> > obtaining an acceptable costing from ICANN/Berkman. If the costs are
> > toooooo great we will need additional sponsors and your offer of
> > assistance is most appreciated YJ. I hope John will be able 
> to come back
> > to us/Roger within a day or two so we can put this issue to 
> behind us.
> > Thanks Roger for helping out.....
> >
> > For future meetings it may be a good idea to set-up a 
> "fund" for remote
> > participation costs so we don't have this predicament at each
> > meeting....
> >
> > As for the room allocation. I have volunteered to be the 
> liaison.....
> >
> > Would EACH constituency please advise me of the capacity of 
> the room,
> > whether they prefer morning or afternoon, the expected 
> duration (eg. ??
> > hours) for their constituency meeting and any "special" facilities
> > required by their constituency for the meeting.
> >
> > Thanks for your help
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > YJ Park wrote:
> >
> > > Andrew and NC members,
> > >
> > > > Please see my attached email of 17 September, which 
> repeats *two*
> earlier
> > > > requests that the Names Council urgently decide (1) 
> whether to webcast
> the
> > > > LA DNSO meetings, and, if so, how to pay for it;  and 
> (2) the schedule
> for
> > > > the LA meetings, and the identity of the scheduling contact.
> > >
> > > I have been a bit confused on whether web cast issue was 
> going to be
> > > discussed
> > > in the budget committee rather than nc as a whole during the
> teleconference.
> > > Since this was tabled due to lack of time, we'd better 
> start to clarify
> each
> > > member's
> > >
> > > (1) yes and no to webcast the LA dnso meetings
> > >      if it turns out yes, let's suggest how to pay for it.
> > >
> > > (2) schedule for the LA meetings and the identity of the 
> scheduling
> contact.
> > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > YJ Park, Non-commercial Constituency
> > >
> > > (1) Yes.
> > >       If it is going to be paid by donation by the 
> companies, I will try
> to
> > > raise fund
> > >       among companies in asia area asap. I prefer this option.
> > >       And if it is going to be paid by each constituency, 
> ncc is going
> to
> > > try to share it.
> > >
> > > (2) I'm going to contact John and Paul as ncc contact 
> point within 24
> hrs.
> >
> > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > >
> > > > If the Names Council does not tomorrow make those 
> decisions, I will
> assume
> > > > that the DNSO will not be meeting in LA, and that no 
> webcast should be
> > > > arranged.
> > >
> > > Hope it's not too late.
> > >
> > > As I proposed a teleconference on Otc. 5 in the review-committee,
> > > another brief teleconference, 20 mins asap might be an 
> option to wrap
> this
> > > up.
> > >
> > > Let's wind this up asap.
> > >
> > > YJ
> > >
> > > > --Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-council@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-council@dnso.org]On Behalf
> Of
> > > Ken
> > > > Stubbs
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:40 PM
> > > > To: Elisabeth PORTENEUVE; Dany Vandromme; Andrew 
> McLaughlin; Louis
> Touton;
> > > > names council
> > > > Cc: roberto gaetano; Mike Roberts
> > > > Subject: [council] names council teleconference 
> thurdsay 21 september
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > for some reason the names council teleconference which 
> is scheduled
> for
> > > > tomorrow has not been posted by elisabeth so here goes
> > > >
> > > > date: thurdsay september 21, 2000
> > > > time: 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 cet
> > > >
> > > > telephone number
> > > >
> > > > Then the dial number will be +33-1-41-74-78-83
> > > > No passcode is required
> > > >
> > > > agenda items:
> > > >
> > > > approval of prior meetings minutes
> > > > budget workgroup report roger & erica
> > > > dnso review report- theresa
> > > > financial report from icann staff
> > > > icann staff report
> > > > for status on independent  review panel nominations.
> > > > proxy voting proposal - paul kane
> > > > business constituancy dues problem
> > > > intake committee report
> > > > discussion regarding individual outreach and representation
> > > >
> > > > we have a lot to accomplish here and i plan on starting 
> the conference
> on
> > > > time...
> > > >
> > > > repeat.... 08:00 usa eastern time 14:00 CET thursday 21 
> september
> > > >
> > > > see you on the call..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> 
>