[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.

To: <Dennis.Jennings@ucd.ie>, <council@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:09:16 +0100
Sender: owner-council@dnso.org

I agree completely with Dennis. WG Cs conclusions are diverse and need time
to consider. 10 weeks seems  wise to me. Are WG C reacting to a deadline
which we the Names Council may have set? If so perhaps we should provide
some comfort to WG C that we will extend the deadline. If it is not our
deadline who is setting the time lines?
Philip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
  - From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>

Prev by Date: RE: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
Next by Date: Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
Prev by thread: RE: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
Next by thread: Re: [council] Call for comments on the Interim Report from the WG-C, new gTLDs.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread